Buschur BADBISH 250x90 Test 3    Shootout    SportCompact
Closed Thread
Page 13 of 24 FirstFirst ... 3 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 23 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 260 of 465

Thread: 17th Annual DSM/EVO Shootout

  1. #241
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tiverton, RI
    Posts
    42

    Default

    WOW this is going to get nuts this year. People are going to be running the ever living crap out of these four bangers. I can not wait.

  2. #242
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    S. Florida
    Posts
    334

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David
    Curt, I've seen the look on your face when you pull the to the starting line quite a few times, judging from that look..........you are always out for blood!
    Yeah nobody is safe with Curt in the next lane.. I hope I have atleast .5 to spare if he is in the next lane..
    Tel. 954-753-6006
    AIM= mikeatawd
    www.AwdMotorsports.com
    • 2003 Black Evo GSR - 8.75@163mph (US Quickest 4g63 Evo )
    • World's Quickest Evo 8 Street Car - 8.98@156mph
    • World's Quickest / Fastest Stock Ecu - 8.99@163mph
    • World's Quickest / Fastest Drag Radial Evo 8/9- 9.05@160mph
    • World's Quickest / Fastest Mivec Evo - 8.99@163mph
    • World's Quickest Stock Frame FP Black - 9.33@146mph
    • World's Quickest / Fastest Stock Turbo Evo - 10.21@133mph ( Most-Wanted )

  3. #243
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Holliston, MA
    Posts
    82

    Default

    Much respect to those who chipped in to increase the payouts! Very impressive of you all!
    Jimmy Read
    1991 Talon TSI AWD - Bests: 10.932 @ 127.78 ( FP 3052 ) RIP
    1991 Clone - 11.3 @ 124 - FP 76HTA pump gas powered 42K mile street whip

  4. #244
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Wakeman, Ohio
    Posts
    4,344

    Default

    Updated the rules for DSM/EVO Stock appearing classes to "get with the times".

    Both classes will now allow a header BUT the turbo must stay in the stock loation.

    Both classes now allow 02 housings with or without open wastegate dumps.

    NO half radiators allowed in either class.

    Both classes can remove the A/C and Power Steering if they wish but it must be done neatly. If you remove it, remove it so half the crap isn't left hanging there.

    Hope this helps you guys out. It was done from quite a few requests.
    David Buschur
    Buschur Racing, Inc
    www.buschurracing.com
    www.highboostforum.com

  5. #245
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Cambridge, OH
    Posts
    223

    Default

    I have to be honest when I say I don't like those changes, but it is what it is.

    If someones car is radical enough to require a header, an o2 dump, and removed A/C and power steering they should run with the big boys.


    That kind of takes the stock "appearing" out of it doesn't it? Now it's more of a stock frame turbo class.

  6. #246
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Cambridge, OH
    Posts
    223

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David
    It was done from quite a few requests.
    I can completely understand you can't please everyone, but for gods sake what didn't they understand about STOCK APPEARING??

  7. #247
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Western WI
    Posts
    356

    Default

    Just to add another point of view, I totally agree with no header or O2 dump for stock appearing class...AC and power steering removed neatly would not be so bad.
    Trev

    Thank you to all at Buschur Racing for all of your help with the Buschur Racing "Magnum"!

  8. #248
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Wakeman, Ohio
    Posts
    4,344

    Default

    Here is the reasoning. #1, EVO RS wasn't suppose to have A/C and I took mine out immediately. Some DSM's did not come with A/C. The power steering on the DSM's can easily be replaced by installing a 1.8 liter manual rack and some guys have done that for weight and because their power steering components have failed and are no longer available. I don't think many guys with EVO's will be dumb enough to take the power steering off since there is no alternative rack, so I changed it just to keep the classes equal.

    We have allowed the SS 02 housings in the class all along. Now that there are companies making the SS 02 housings with an external dump for the wastegate, rather than leave them out of the class I thought it was best to include them. Bottom line is, if you have a good exhaust on your car the dump isn't going to help you and in our testing it hurts the EVO's, put the advantage to a properly built EVO with no external dump.

    The headers. There are just SO many guys with EVO's that have bought those cheap Ebay headers out there that not letting them in the class from one incorrect part is silly. We know that there are only 2 headers that outperform the stock ported manifold. One of them is built by Shearer Fabrications for the EVO and he is a MAJOR sponsor of this years race and I hate to not let someone run in the class that has a Shearer header on the car.

    These are pretty small changes really and I have made rule changes over the years to keep up with the times.

    I hope you guys that aren't for it understand.
    David Buschur
    Buschur Racing, Inc
    www.buschurracing.com
    www.highboostforum.com

  9. #249
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Cambridge, OH
    Posts
    223

    Default

    Let me start by saying, I am not trying to argue with you, I have a great deal of respect for you. This is your Shootout, and ultimately your decision. But here are my gripes, then I will be done with the subject.

    Quote Originally Posted by David
    Here is the reasoning. #1, EVO RS wasn't suppose to have A/C and I took mine out immediately. Some DSM's did not come with A/C.
    A/C delete in DSA should be allowed then and not allowed in ESA. USDM Evos ALL had A/C. Your engine bay is by far my favorite of any, but far from Stock appearing.

    Quote Originally Posted by David
    The power steering on the DSM's can easily be replaced by installing a 1.8 liter manual rack and some guys have done that for weight and because their power steering components have failed and are no longer available. I don't think many guys with EVO's will be dumb enough to take the power steering off since there is no alternative rack, so I changed it just to keep the classes equal.
    Again I have to say if the parts really aren't available for DSMs that shouldn't affect the Evo class.

    Quote Originally Posted by David
    The headers. There are just SO many guys with EVO's that have bought those cheap Ebay headers out there that not letting them in the class from one incorrect part is silly. We know that there are only 2 headers that outperform the stock ported manifold. One of them is built by Shearer Fabrications for the EVO and he is a MAJOR sponsor of this years race and I hate to not let someone run in the class that has a Shearer header on the car.
    Ron's manifold is a beautiful work of art. It is also proven to make more power. It is however not stock appearing. The guys running these manifolds should have no problem running EE. That wouldn't be penalizing them.

    Again I mean no disrespect, and hope you don't get offended by me speaking my mind. It just kills me that a truely stock appearing street car just won't be able to be competitive in that kind of field.

  10. #250
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Western WI
    Posts
    356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David
    I hope you guys that aren't for it understand.
    I totally understand your reasoning. Good info
    Trev

    Thank you to all at Buschur Racing for all of your help with the Buschur Racing "Magnum"!

  11. #251
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    69

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2highpsi
    Again I mean no disrespect, and hope you don't get offended by me speaking my mind. It just kills me that a truely stock appearing street car just won't be able to be competitive in that kind of field.
    It would be great if a field of true "Stock appearing" cars could be put together, but it seems like there are less and less each year and even less that are prepared to race them.
    Last year there were only about five cars that showed for this class and Dave was considering removing the class in the future. If a few more mods are allowed hopefully there will be more people prepared to race.
    As long as the small frame turbo remains and the cars are not hacked I'm for it. We have two DSA customer cars coming down with us this year, that are running high 11's, so let's hope we can keep the class alive.
    -Fastest 1G AWD DSM in Canada.
    -2008 DSM Eliminator Winner.
    www.forcepower.ca

  12. #252
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Wakeman, Ohio
    Posts
    4,344

    Default

    2highpsi,

    I do not mind you saying what's on your mind at all. It is not MY shootout, it is everyone's shootout.

    I just plastered the rule changes on a bunch of other sites. I'd personally like to leave them stand as I changed them.

    A few things to consider, if you will. The two quickest/fastest stock appearing EVO's to date have both run 9.5's, that was on the stock ported exhaust manifolds. Just a header is not going to put one car at an advantage over another, there is much more to a build than the header or any single part. I could put every part from my RS into a large container and send it out to just about anyone and I'd put money on the build the parts went on would not be as fast as my car is. Just consider that. Also consider that the two headers that do make more power than the ported stock manifold are $800+. I am changing the rule to let some of these $199 header equipped cars in the classes and I can assure you, they make less power than a ported stock manifold. Advantage goes to you there.

    As Blackbird pointed out the DSA and ESA classes are two of the smallest classes at the shootout. I think DSA actually had 3 cars in it last year. I truly hope that changes this year for both classes.
    David Buschur
    Buschur Racing, Inc
    www.buschurracing.com
    www.highboostforum.com

  13. #253
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    LaGrange, ohio
    Posts
    3,379

    Default

    These clutches you speak of for B1 and B2.. I assume they are for EVO b1 and b2...??
    " chillin' and grillin "..

    11.52@125 Auto. China turbo

  14. #254
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    living under the buschur dyno
    Posts
    2,146

    Default

    i cant wait for this im def running in one of these two classes bc im slow....
    DB quote "....this isn't some chinese piece of shit...."

  15. #255
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Wakeman, Ohio
    Posts
    4,344

    Default

    The clutches will be for whatever DSM/EVO you own, a certificate for the clutch more than likely that you will just mail in.
    David Buschur
    Buschur Racing, Inc
    www.buschurracing.com
    www.highboostforum.com

  16. #256
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Memphis,TN
    Posts
    131

    Default

    for those who are on the fence about going, here's the video footage I shot last year:

    http://www.racevideoforums.com/forum...-coverage.html
    - Chris
    MellonTuning.com - Stock ECU custom tuning Flash ROMs for your EVO done via e-mail or local - Tuning Evo 7, 8, 9, & 10's and even older models with ecu swaps!

    Hablas espaņol ? , no te preocupes contactanos si tienes alguna pregunta acerca de hacerle tuning a tu evolution , estamos aqui para ayudarte .


    Stock ECU/MAS Full weight EVO records:
    Quickest and fastest on 93 octane 10.41 @ 135
    Fastest on e85 139.80
    Highest WHP 703

    Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/MellonTuning

  17. #257
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    LaGrange, ohio
    Posts
    3,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David
    The clutches will be for whatever DSM/EVO you own, a certificate for the clutch more than likely that you will just mail in.

    What kinda answer is that? I only had 4 years of Community College...


    My FWD is taking either B1 or B2( 2nd last year 13.50 @ 105mph. ).... I just wanna make sure I'm gonna get a clutch...This is B2--for now... DSM....


    Just confused on the response David......????????
    " chillin' and grillin "..

    11.52@125 Auto. China turbo

  18. #258
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Memphis,TN
    Posts
    131

    Default

    he's saying you'll win a certificate for a clutch...when you redeem the certificate you'll tell them what car you own and receive the proper fitting clutch.
    - Chris
    MellonTuning.com - Stock ECU custom tuning Flash ROMs for your EVO done via e-mail or local - Tuning Evo 7, 8, 9, & 10's and even older models with ecu swaps!

    Hablas espaņol ? , no te preocupes contactanos si tienes alguna pregunta acerca de hacerle tuning a tu evolution , estamos aqui para ayudarte .


    Stock ECU/MAS Full weight EVO records:
    Quickest and fastest on 93 octane 10.41 @ 135
    Fastest on e85 139.80
    Highest WHP 703

    Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/MellonTuning

  19. #259
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Question regarding the DSE class: My buddy plans on attending and racing with his 2G. He has some nice cage work that prevents the back seat from fitting. And to make it look clean, he has some really nice tin work covering the back seat and hatch areas.

    Now, I just noticed that the rules state: "-Any vehicle racing at the event that has a full roll cage that interfers with the installation of headliner or back seat will be allowed to run without those interior parts."

    The rest of the factory interior is still present. I just want to be sure that his rear tin work won't disqualify him from competing in the DSE class.

    Thanks.

  20. #260
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Holliston, MA
    Posts
    82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pvolk
    Question regarding the DSE class: My buddy plans on attending and racing with his 2G. He has some nice cage work that prevents the back seat from fitting. And to make it look clean, he has some really nice tin work covering the back seat and hatch areas.

    Now, I just noticed that the rules state: "-Any vehicle racing at the event that has a full roll cage that interfers with the installation of headliner or back seat will be allowed to run without those interior parts."

    The rest of the factory interior is still present. I just want to be sure that his rear tin work won't disqualify him from competing in the DSE class.

    Thanks.
    Pictures would probably help your cause.
    Jimmy Read
    1991 Talon TSI AWD - Bests: 10.932 @ 127.78 ( FP 3052 ) RIP
    1991 Clone - 11.3 @ 124 - FP 76HTA pump gas powered 42K mile street whip

Closed Thread
Page 13 of 24 FirstFirst ... 3 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 23 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts